NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 360 MHz
- 15.8x more texture fill rate: 45.4 GTexel / s vs 2.88 GTexel / s
- 21x more pipelines: 336 vs 16
- 47.2x better floating-point performance: 1,088.6 gflops vs 23.04 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 33x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2774 vs 84
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 433 vs 385
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 628
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 628
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 May 2011 vs 12 September 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 360 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 45.4 GTexel / s vs 2.88 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 336 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,088.6 gflops vs 23.04 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 vs 84 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 433 vs 385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 628 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 | 84 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 433 | 385 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8694 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.82 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.201 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.402 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.233 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3754 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3754 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 628 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GF114 | G84 |
| Launch date | 17 May 2011 | 12 September 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $129 |
| Place in performance rating | 864 | 867 |
| Price now | $353.59 | $92.75 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.61 | 1.17 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 360 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,088.6 gflops | 23.04 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 99 °C | |
| Pipelines | 336 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 45.4 GTexel / s | 2.88 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | 198 mm |
| SLI options | 2-Way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1450
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3300 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
ATIFirePro V5800
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
