NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM versus AMD FirePro V4900
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM and AMD FirePro V4900 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 824 MHz versus 800 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 39.55 GTexel / s versus 19.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 576 versus 480
- Environ 24% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 949.2 gflops versus 768.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 15% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1887 versus 990
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 429 versus 312
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5207 versus 1928
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.806 versus 6.303
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.51 versus 392.237
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.535 versus 0.597
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.524 versus 17.874
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 April 2013 versus 1 November 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 824 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.55 GTexel / s versus 19.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 576 versus 480 |
Performance á point flottant | 949.2 gflops versus 768.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1887 versus 990 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 429 versus 312 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5207 versus 1928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.806 versus 6.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.51 versus 392.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.535 versus 0.597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.524 versus 17.874 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro V4900
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.818 versus 38.664
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1747 versus 1435
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 versus 3531
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 versus 3300
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1747 versus 1435
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 versus 3531
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 versus 3300
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.818 versus 38.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 versus 1435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3753 versus 3531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7745 versus 3300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 versus 1435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3753 versus 3531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7745 versus 3300 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V4900
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | AMD FirePro V4900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1887 | 990 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 429 | 312 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5207 | 1928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.806 | 6.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.51 | 392.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.535 | 0.597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.524 | 17.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.664 | 72.818 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1435 | 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3531 | 3753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3300 | 7745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1435 | 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3531 | 3753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3300 | 7745 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | AMD FirePro V4900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GK106 | Turks |
Date de sortie | 22 April 2013 | 1 November 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 977 | 980 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 824 MHz | 800 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 949.2 gflops | 768.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.55 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 716 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 147 mm | 163 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |