NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 824 MHz versus 736 MHz
- Environ 12% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 39.55 GTexel / s versus 35.33 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 576 versus 288
- Environ 12% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 949.2 gflops versus 847.9 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 4% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 3828 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 431 versus 423
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.524 versus 27.232
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 versus 3114
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 versus 3114
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 April 2013 versus 20 February 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 824 MHz versus 736 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.55 GTexel / s versus 35.33 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 576 versus 288 |
Performance á point flottant | 949.2 gflops versus 847.9 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 3828 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 431 versus 423 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.524 versus 27.232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3531 versus 3114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3531 versus 3114 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1914 versus 1882
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7009 versus 5220
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.456 versus 13.806
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 versus 546.51
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.693 versus 1.535
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.114 versus 38.664
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 versus 1435
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3300
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 versus 1435
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3300
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1914 versus 1882 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7009 versus 5220 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.456 versus 13.806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 618.773 versus 546.51 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.693 versus 1.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.114 versus 38.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 versus 1435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 versus 1435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3300 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1882 | 1914 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 431 | 423 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5220 | 7009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.806 | 18.456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.51 | 618.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.535 | 1.693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.524 | 27.232 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.664 | 50.114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1435 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3531 | 3114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3300 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1435 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3531 | 3114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3300 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK106 | GF114 |
Date de sortie | 22 April 2013 | 20 February 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 967 | 969 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 824 MHz | 736 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 949.2 gflops | 847.9 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 288 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.55 GTexel / s | 35.33 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 147 mm | 210 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 91.87 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 3828 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |