NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 778 MHz
- Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 43.6 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 768 vs 336
- Around 52% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 1,045.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 134 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 vs 1872
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 458 vs 418
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9573 vs 7872
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 vs 22.161
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 3398
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3242 vs 3117
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 3398
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3242 vs 3117
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 March 2013 vs 24 September 2011 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 778 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec vs 43.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops vs 1,045.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 vs 1872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 vs 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9573 vs 7872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 vs 22.161 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 vs 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 vs 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 vs 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 vs 3117 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
- 668x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 781.734 vs 561.43
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.125 vs 2.026
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.218 vs 30.868
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.212 vs 51.009
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3537 vs 3426
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3537 vs 3426
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 781.734 vs 561.43 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.125 vs 2.026 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.218 vs 30.868 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.212 vs 51.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3537 vs 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3537 vs 3426 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | 1872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 | 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9573 | 7872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | 22.161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | 781.734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | 2.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | 47.218 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | 75.212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | 3537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | 3537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | 3117 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GK106 | GF114 |
Launch date | 26 March 2013 | 24 September 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 835 | 838 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $199.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 778 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec | 43.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 210 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 96.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 4008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |