NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 26% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 778 MHz
• Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 43.6 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 768 vs 336
• Around 52% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 1,045.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 134 Watt vs 160 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 vs 1872
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 418
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9583 vs 7872
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 vs 22.161
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 3398
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3242 vs 3117
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 3398
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3242 vs 3117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

• 668x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 781.734 vs 561.43
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.125 vs 2.026
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.218 vs 30.868
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.212 vs 51.009
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3537 vs 3426
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3537 vs 3426

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3341 1872
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	460 418
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9583 7872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.21 22.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	561.43 781.734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.026 2.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.868 47.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	51.009 75.212
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 3537
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3642 3398
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 3117
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 3537
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3642 3398
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3242 3117

Compare specifications (specs)