NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon HD 7790
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and AMD Radeon HD 7790 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 56 GTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 vs 3090
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 988
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3242 vs 2061
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 988
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3242 vs 2061
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec vs 56 GTexel / s |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 vs 3090 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 vs 2061 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 vs 2061 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7790
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 1,792 gflops vs 1,585 gflops
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 134 Watt
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14832 vs 9573
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.763 vs 25.21
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 828.247 vs 561.43
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.646 vs 2.026
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.284 vs 30.868
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.744 vs 51.009
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5087 vs 3426
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5087 vs 3426
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops vs 1,585 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 134 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 vs 458 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14832 vs 9573 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 vs 25.21 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.247 vs 561.43 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 vs 2.026 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 vs 30.868 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.744 vs 51.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5087 vs 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5087 vs 3426 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7790
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | AMD Radeon HD 7790 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | 3090 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 | 459 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9573 | 14832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | 40.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | 828.247 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | 3.646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | 63.284 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | 217.744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | 5087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | 2061 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | 5087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | 2061 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | AMD Radeon HD 7790 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GK106 | Bonaire |
| Launch date | 26 March 2013 | 22 March 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $149 |
| Place in performance rating | 835 | 836 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Price now | $134.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 29.57 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec | 56 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 183 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon HD 7790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon HD 8210E
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDFirePro S9300 X2
