NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
Around 63% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 600 MHz
Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 48.0 billion / sec
Around 26% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 1,256 gflops
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 vs 2717
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 371
Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 vs 18.251
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 vs 1.9
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 3383
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 3383

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	26 March 2013 vs 1 October 2012
Core clock speed	980 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate	62.7 billion / sec vs 48.0 billion / sec
Floating-point performance	1,585 gflops vs 1,256 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3341 vs 2717
PassMark - G2D Mark	460 vs 371
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.21 vs 18.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.026 vs 1.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3642 vs 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3642 vs 3383

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Around 25% higher pipelines: 960 vs 768
Around 34% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 134 Watt
300x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10685 vs 9583
Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 665.068 vs 561.43
Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.241 vs 30.868
Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.895 vs 51.009
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 3426
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 3242
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 3426
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 3242

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	960 vs 768
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 134 Watt
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	10685 vs 9583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	665.068 vs 561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	36.241 vs 30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	62.895 vs 51.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4175 vs 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3334 vs 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4175 vs 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3334 vs 3242

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3341

2717

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

460

371

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9583

10685

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25.21

18.251

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

561.43

665.068

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.026

1.9

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.868

36.241

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

51.009

62.895

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3426

4175

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3642

3383

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3242

3334

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3426

4175

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3642

3383

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3242

3334

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
PassMark - G3D Mark	3341	2717
PassMark - G2D Mark	460	371
Geekbench - OpenCL	9583	10685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.21	18.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	561.43	665.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.026	1.9
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.868	36.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	51.009	62.895
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3426	4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3642	3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3242	3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3426	4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3642	3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3242	3334
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1106

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK106	GK104
Launch date	26 March 2013	1 October 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$169
Place in performance rating	834	836
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1033 MHz
Core clock speed	980 MHz	600 MHz
CUDA cores	768	960
Floating-point performance	1,585 gflops	1,256 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C
Pipelines	768	960
Texture fill rate	62.7 billion / sec	48.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	134 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	2,540 million	3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...	No outputs
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	Up to 2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	PCI Express 2.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	9.5" (24.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	One 6-pin	None
Laptop size		large
SLI options		2-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.3	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	144.2 GB / s	115.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6.0 GB/s	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
DirectX 11		DirectX 11