NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 48.0 billion / sec
- Around 26% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 1,256 gflops
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 vs 2717
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 458 vs 371
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 vs 18.251
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 vs 1.9
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 3383
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 3383
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 March 2013 vs 1 October 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec vs 48.0 billion / sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops vs 1,256 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 vs 2717 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 vs 371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 vs 18.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 vs 1.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 vs 3383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 vs 3383 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 960 vs 768
- Around 34% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 134 Watt
- 300x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10789 vs 9573
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 665.068 vs 561.43
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.241 vs 30.868
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.895 vs 51.009
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 3426
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 3242
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 3426
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 3242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 134 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10789 vs 9573 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 665.068 vs 561.43 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 vs 30.868 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.895 vs 51.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 vs 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 3242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 vs 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 3242 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | 2717 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 | 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9573 | 10789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | 18.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | 665.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | 1.9 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | 36.241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | 62.895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | 4175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | 3383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | 4175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | 3383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | 3334 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK106 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 26 March 2013 | 1 October 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Place in performance rating | 836 | 838 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | 960 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops | 1,256 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 960 |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec | 48.0 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon HD 7790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon HD 8210E
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDFirePro S9300 X2
