NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 63% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 48.0 billion / sec
  • Around 26% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 1,256 gflops
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 vs 2717
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 458 vs 371
  • Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 vs 18.251
  • Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 vs 1.9
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 3383
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 3383
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 26 March 2013 vs 1 October 2012
Core clock speed 980 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate 62.7 billion / sec vs 48.0 billion / sec
Floating-point performance 1,585 gflops vs 1,256 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3337 vs 2717
PassMark - G2D Mark 458 vs 371
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 25.21 vs 18.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.026 vs 1.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3642 vs 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3642 vs 3383

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 960 vs 768
  • Around 34% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 134 Watt
  • 300x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
  • Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10767 vs 9573
  • Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 665.068 vs 561.43
  • Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.241 vs 30.868
  • Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.895 vs 51.009
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 3426
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 3242
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 3426
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 3242
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 960 vs 768
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 134 Watt
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 10767 vs 9573
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 665.068 vs 561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 36.241 vs 30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 62.895 vs 51.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4175 vs 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3334 vs 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4175 vs 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3334 vs 3242

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3337
2717
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
458
371
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
9573
10767
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25.21
18.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
561.43
665.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.026
1.9
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
30.868
36.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
51.009
62.895
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3426
4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3642
3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3242
3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3426
4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3642
3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3242
3334
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
PassMark - G3D Mark 3337 2717
PassMark - G2D Mark 458 371
Geekbench - OpenCL 9573 10767
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 25.21 18.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 561.43 665.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.026 1.9
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.868 36.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 51.009 62.895
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3426 4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3642 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3242 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3426 4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3642 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3242 3334
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1106

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Kepler
Code name GK106 GK104
Launch date 26 March 2013 1 October 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $169
Place in performance rating 835 837
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1033 MHz
Core clock speed 980 MHz 600 MHz
CUDA cores 768 960
Floating-point performance 1,585 gflops 1,256 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C
Pipelines 768 960
Texture fill rate 62.7 billion / sec 48.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 134 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 2,540 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... No outputs
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536 Up to 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0 PCI Express 2.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 9.5" (24.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin None
Laptop size large
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12 API
OpenGL 4.3 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 144.2 GB / s 115.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6.0 GB/s 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
DirectX 11 DirectX 11