NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 6670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 6670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 768 vs 480
- Around 86% better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 768.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 724
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 247
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7900 vs 1905
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.168 vs 4.861
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 vs 235.463
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 vs 0.463
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.29 vs 15.918
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 47.404 vs 38.551
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 1564
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3260
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 1564
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 9 October 2012 vs 19 April 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 480 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops vs 768.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 vs 724 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 vs 247 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7900 vs 1905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 vs 4.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 vs 235.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 vs 0.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 vs 15.918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 vs 38.551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 3260 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6670
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 66 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 210x more memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt vs 110 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 3335 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 | 724 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 | 247 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7900 | 1905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 | 4.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 | 235.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 | 0.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 | 15.918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 | 38.551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK106 | Turks |
| Launch date | 9 October 2012 | 19 April 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $99 |
| Place in performance rating | 846 | 1255 |
| Price now | $169.99 | $102.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 18.72 | 13.12 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops | 768.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec | 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 66 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 716 million |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro K510M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
AMDFirePro M6100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 825M
