NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti versus AMD Radeon HD 6670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 6670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 59.2 billion / sec versus 19.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 480
- Environ 86% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,425 gflops versus 768.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 versus 724
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 versus 247
- 4.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7900 versus 1905
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.168 versus 4.861
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 versus 235.463
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 versus 0.463
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.29 versus 15.918
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 47.404 versus 38.551
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 versus 1564
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 versus 3260
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 versus 1564
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 versus 3260
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 9 October 2012 versus 19 April 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 billion / sec versus 19.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 480 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,425 gflops versus 768.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 versus 724 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 versus 247 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7900 versus 1905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 versus 4.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 versus 235.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 versus 0.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 versus 15.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 versus 38.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 versus 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 versus 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 3260 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6670
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 66 Watt versus 110 Watt
- 210x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1050 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt versus 110 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3335 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 | 724 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 | 247 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7900 | 1905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 | 4.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 | 235.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 | 0.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 | 15.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 | 38.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GK106 | Turks |
Date de sortie | 9 October 2012 | 19 April 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 846 | 1255 |
Prix maintenant | $169.99 | $102.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.72 | 13.12 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 928 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,425 gflops | 768.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 billion / sec | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 66 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 716 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 168 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |