NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 6790

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 6790 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 840 MHz
• Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 33.6 GTexel / s
• Around 6% better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 1,344.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 1590
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 411 vs 367
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.168 vs 12.318
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 vs 1.234
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 3127
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3534
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 3127
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3534

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6790

• Around 4% higher pipelines: 800 vs 768
• 840x more memory clock speed: 4200 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.421 vs 592.345
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.768 vs 28.29
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.423 vs 47.404

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6790

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2527 1590
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	411 367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.168 12.318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	592.345 750.421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.141 1.234
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.29 28.768
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	47.404 121.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3948 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3707 3534
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3335 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3948 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3707 3534
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3335 3350

Compare specifications (specs)