NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 8.2x more texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 7.2 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
- 15x better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 95.04 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 14.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 170
- 8.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 49
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7900 vs 5606
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2145
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2145
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 9 October 2012 vs 10 January 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec vs 7.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops vs 95.04 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 vs 170 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 vs 49 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7900 vs 5606 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 2145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 vs 2145 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 990 MHz vs 928 MHz
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 110 Watt
| Core clock speed | 990 MHz vs 928 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 | 170 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 | 49 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7900 | 5606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 2145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 2145 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK106 | GT216 |
| Launch date | 9 October 2012 | 10 January 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Place in performance rating | 846 | 1547 |
| Price now | $169.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 990 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops | 95.04 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec | 7.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 486 million |
| Gigaflops | 142 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... | Dual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMIVGASingle Link DVI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro K510M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
AMDFirePro M6100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 825M
