NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 54% higher core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 601 MHz
• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 48.08 GTexel / s
• Around 23% better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2530 vs 1957
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 vs 302
• Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7902 vs 5986
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.168 vs 10.054
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 vs 544.601
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 vs 1.46
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.29 vs 22.103
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 47.404 vs 36.553
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 3855
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 3855

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 960 vs 768
• Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 110 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 560x more memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 vs 3707
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 3335
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 vs 3707
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 3335

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2530 1957
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	413 302
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7902 5986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.168 10.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	592.345 544.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.141 1.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.29 22.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	47.404 36.553
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3948 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3707 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3335 4470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3948 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3707 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3335 4470

Compare specifications (specs)