NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs AMD Radeon HD 6650M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and AMD Radeon HD 6650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1750 vs 753
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 224
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 1866
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 1866
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 November 2013 vs 4 January 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 576.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 vs 753 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 1866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 1866 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6650M
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- 320x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5780 vs 4493
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5780 vs 4493 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 3332 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6650M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | AMD Radeon HD 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 | 753 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 224 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | 5780 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 1866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 1866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3334 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | AMD Radeon HD 6650M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK106 | Whistler |
| Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 4 January 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1043 | 1046 |
| Price now | $144.81 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec | 14.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6750
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M335
