NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and AMD Radeon HD 6750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 34% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 86 Watt
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1751 vs 1043
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 273
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 vs 8.039
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 vs 0.867
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 2100
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 3378
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 2100
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 3378

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750

• Around 88% higher pipelines: 720 vs 384
• Around 24% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
• 210x more memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 544.041 vs 364.463
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.664 vs 18.386
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.074 vs 23.499
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3332
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3332

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1751 1043
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	362 273
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.582 8.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.463 544.041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.254 0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.386 20.664
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.499 91.074
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2663 2100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3478 3378
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3332 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2663 2100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3478 3378
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3332 3358

Compare specifications (specs)