NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and AMD Radeon HD 6750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 34% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 86 Watt
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1750 vs 1043
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 273
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 vs 8.039
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 vs 0.867
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 2100
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 3378
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 2100
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 3378
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 November 2013 vs 21 January 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt vs 86 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 vs 1043 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 273 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 vs 8.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 vs 0.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 2100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 3378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 2100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 3378 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 720 vs 384
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
- 210x more memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 544.041 vs 364.463
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.664 vs 18.386
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.074 vs 23.499
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3332
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 720 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 812.5 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.041 vs 364.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.664 vs 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.074 vs 23.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3332 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 | 1043 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | 8.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | 544.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | 0.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | 20.664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | 91.074 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 2100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 3378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 2100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 3378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK106 | Juniper |
| Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 21 January 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $49.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 1043 | 1045 |
| Price now | $144.81 | $49.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | 33.46 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 720 |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 86 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | 170 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6750
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M335
