NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 versus AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and AMD Radeon HD 6750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 33.9 billion / sec versus 25.2 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 34% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 64 Watt versus 86 Watt
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1750 versus 1043
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 versus 273
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 versus 8.039
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 versus 0.867
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 2100
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 3378
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 2100
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 3378
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 versus 21 January 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec versus 25.2 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt versus 86 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 versus 1043 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 versus 273 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 versus 8.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 versus 0.867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 versus 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 versus 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 3378 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6750
- Environ 88% de pipelines plus haut: 720 versus 384
- Environ 24% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,008.0 gflops versus 812.5 gflops
- 210x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1050 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 544.041 versus 364.463
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.664 versus 18.386
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.074 versus 23.499
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3332
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3332
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 720 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,008.0 gflops versus 812.5 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.041 versus 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.664 versus 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.074 versus 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3332 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1750 | 1043 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 273 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | 8.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | 544.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | 20.664 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | 91.074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GK106 | Juniper |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 | 21 January 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | $49.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1043 | 1045 |
Prix maintenant | $144.81 | $49.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | 33.46 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 720 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 86 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,040 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | 170 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |