NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 96% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s
- 10x more pipelines: 960 vs 96
- 12.4x better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 160 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 8.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4000 vs 467
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 365
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 1820
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 1820
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 September 2012 vs 23 February 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops vs 160 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4000 vs 467 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 vs 365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 1820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 1820 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 266.7x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 140 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4000 | 467 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 | 365 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11374 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | 1820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 | 1820 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK106 | G92 |
| Launch date | 6 September 2012 | 23 February 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Place in performance rating | 774 | 776 |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops | 160 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 960 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec | 16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 51.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| Gigathread technology | ||
| HDCP-capable | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 160M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
AMDRadeon E8950
