NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5100M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 98.69 GTexel / s vs 78.4 billion / sec
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 960
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 2,369 gflops vs 1,981 gflops
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 600x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11427 vs 11368
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 vs 3581
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3690
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 vs 3581
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3690
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 6 September 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s vs 78.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 960 |
Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops vs 1,981 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 vs 11368 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 vs 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 vs 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3690 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4005 vs 3191
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 350
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 vs 5.972
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 355.305
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 1.022
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 vs 15.706
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 vs 34.772
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4005 vs 3191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 350 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 vs 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 vs 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 vs 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 vs 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 vs 34.772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 3362 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3191 | 4005 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 | 480 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 | 11368 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.972 | 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 | 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.022 | 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 | 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 | 62.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3365 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK104 | GK106 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 6 September 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 775 | 776 |
Price now | $309.99 | $349.99 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.80 | 14.35 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,540 million |
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |