NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 70% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 575 MHz
• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 32.2 GTexel / s
• 2.1x more pipelines: 960 vs 448
• Around 92% better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 238 Watt
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 3121
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 462
• Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 vs 9716
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 vs 26.223
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 3.015
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 3245
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 3245

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070

• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• 500x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 908.754 vs 705.293
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.519 vs 35.416
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 93.344 vs 62.69
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3690
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3690

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4017 3121
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	487 462
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11364 9716
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.505 26.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	705.293 908.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.085 3.015
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.416 43.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	62.69 93.344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3581 3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3690 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3365 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3581 3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3690 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3365 3351

Compare specifications (specs)