NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2.4x more core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 9.5x more texture fill rate: 30.4 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
• 48x more pipelines: 384 vs 8
• 57x better floating-point performance: 729.6 gflops vs 12.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
• 6.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 800 MHz
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5125 vs 542

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G

• 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 542 vs 91.5

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5125 542
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	91.5 542

Compare specifications (specs)