NVIDIA GeForce 800M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 22.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 703 vs 31.3
- 25.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1123 vs 43.4
- 17.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1601 vs 91.5
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 1 April 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 vs 31.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 vs 43.4 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 vs 91.5 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 738 MHz
- 5.1x more texture fill rate: 30.4 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 5.1x better floating-point performance: 729.6 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.245 vs 4.91
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 301.554 vs 109.13
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.08 vs 7.249
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.56 vs 15.218
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1848 vs 703
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2690 vs 1123
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5125 vs 1601
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 738 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30.4 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops vs 141.7 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.245 vs 4.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 301.554 vs 109.13 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.08 vs 7.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.56 vs 15.218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1848 vs 703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2690 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5125 vs 1601 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 | 11.245 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.13 | 301.554 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.249 | 16.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 | 16.56 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 703 | 1848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | 2690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1601 | 5125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 | 31.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | 43.4 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 | 91.5 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.785 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF117 | GK107 |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1503 | 1504 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 950 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | 729.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s | 30.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |