NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 835 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 30.4 billion / sec vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 729.6 gflops vs 288 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1452 vs 417
- 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 42
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2253 vs 1963
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2253 vs 1963
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 1 December 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 835 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion / sec vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops vs 288 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1452 vs 417 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 vs 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 vs 1963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 vs 1963 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3259 vs 3176
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3259 vs 3176
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 vs 3176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 vs 3176 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1452 | 417 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 42 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4037 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 405.086 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.098 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.798 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 33.754 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1094 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 | 1963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3176 | 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1094 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 | 1963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3176 | 3259 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 475 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK107 | G92 |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 1 December 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1275 | 1277 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Price now | $49.95 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.55 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 835 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | 288 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion / sec | 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800 GTX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2800M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M vs
ATIFirePro M7820
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650G
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
