NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M vs AMD FirePro V4900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M and AMD FirePro V4900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 39.7 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• Around 24% better floating-point performance: 952.3 gflops vs 768.0 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1929 vs 988
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 313 vs 309
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.12 vs 6.303
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 664.78 vs 392.237
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.003 vs 0.597
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.983 vs 17.874
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2649 vs 1747
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2649 vs 1747

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900

• Around 29% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 620 MHz
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12641 vs 6362
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.818 vs 59.007
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 vs 3690
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 3347
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 vs 3690
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 3347

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V4900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1929 988
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	313 309
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6362 12641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.12 6.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	664.78 392.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.003 0.597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.983 17.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	59.007 72.818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2649 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3690 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 7745
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2649 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3690 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 7745

Compare specifications (specs)