NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M and ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 525 MHz
- 18.9x more texture fill rate: 39.7 billion / sec vs 2.1 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
- 22.7x better floating-point performance: 952.3 gflops vs 42 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 88% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 16.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1928 vs 114
- 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 426
- 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 426
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 28 June 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz vs 525 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion / sec vs 2.1 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 40 |
| Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops vs 42 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1928 vs 114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 426 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 346 vs 314
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 346 vs 314 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M | ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1928 | 114 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 346 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6362 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.12 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 664.78 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.003 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.983 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.007 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2649 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2649 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 426 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M | ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | GF114 | RV610 |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 28 June 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 951 | 953 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 525 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | 42 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion / sec | 2.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 340 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
AMDFirePro M4000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M370
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
AMDRadeon 680M
