NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 39.7 billion / sec vs 35.33 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 384 vs 288
• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 952.3 gflops vs 847.9 gflops
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1925 vs 1851
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.12 vs 18.456
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 664.78 vs 618.773
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.003 vs 1.693
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.983 vs 27.232
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.007 vs 50.114
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 3114
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 3114

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 736 MHz vs 620 MHz
• 2.6x more memory clock speed: 3828 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 467 vs 312
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7032 vs 6362
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 2649
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 2649

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1925 1851
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	312 467
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6362 7032
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.12 18.456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	664.78 618.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.003 1.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.983 27.232
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	59.007 50.114
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2649 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3690 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2649 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3690 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 3356

Compare specifications (specs)