NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 39.7 billion / sec versus 35.33 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 288
- Environ 12% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 952.3 gflops versus 847.9 gflops
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1925 versus 1851
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.12 versus 18.456
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 664.78 versus 618.773
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.003 versus 1.693
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.983 versus 27.232
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.007 versus 50.114
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 3114
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 3114
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 20 February 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.7 billion / sec versus 35.33 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 288 |
| Performance á point flottant | 952.3 gflops versus 847.9 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1925 versus 1851 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.12 versus 18.456 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 664.78 versus 618.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.003 versus 1.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.983 versus 27.232 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.007 versus 50.114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 3114 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 736 MHz versus 620 MHz
- 2.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3828 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 467 versus 312
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7032 versus 6362
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 versus 2649
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 versus 2649
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 736 MHz versus 620 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3828 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 467 versus 312 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7032 versus 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 versus 2649 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 versus 2649 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3347 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1925 | 1851 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | 467 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6362 | 7032 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.12 | 18.456 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 664.78 | 618.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.003 | 1.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.983 | 27.232 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.007 | 50.114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2649 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2649 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF114 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 20 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 929 | 936 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 620 MHz | 736 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 952.3 gflops | 847.9 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 288 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.7 billion / sec | 35.33 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.0 GB / s | 91.87 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | 3828 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M330
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient
