NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1006 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 13.4x more texture fill rate: 128.8 billion / sec vs 9.6 billion / sec
• 16x more pipelines: 1536 vs 96
• 13.4x better floating-point performance: 3,090.4 gflops vs 230.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2048 MB vs 1 GB
• 6.7x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 900 MHz
• 12.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5590 vs 456
• 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 531 vs 94
• 10x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18376 vs 1837
• 9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.086 vs 5.099
• 7.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 989.685 vs 131.334
• 13.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.645 vs 0.355
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.463 vs 6.733
• 12.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.577 vs 8.015
• 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7222 vs 911
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 1338
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3306 vs 2623
• 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7222 vs 911
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 1338
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3306 vs 2623

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M

• 8.5x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 195 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5590 456
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	531 94
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	18376 1837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.086 5.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	989.685 131.334
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.645 0.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.463 6.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	99.577 8.015
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7222 911
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3666 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3306 2623
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7222 911
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3666 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3306 2623

Compare specifications (specs)