NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 68% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1006 MHz versus 600 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 128.8 billion / sec versus 9.6 billion / sec
- 16x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 96
- 13.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,090.4 gflops versus 230.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2048 MB versus 1 GB
- 6.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 900 MHz
- 12.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5590 versus 456
- 5.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 531 versus 94
- 10x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18376 versus 1837
- 9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.086 versus 5.099
- 7.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 989.685 versus 131.334
- 13.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.645 versus 0.355
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.463 versus 6.733
- 12.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.577 versus 8.015
- 7.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7222 versus 911
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 versus 1338
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3306 versus 2623
- 7.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7222 versus 911
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 versus 1338
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3306 versus 2623
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 5 January 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1006 MHz versus 600 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.8 billion / sec versus 9.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,090.4 gflops versus 230.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2048 MB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 900 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 versus 456 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 531 versus 94 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18376 versus 1837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.086 versus 5.099 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 versus 131.334 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.645 versus 0.355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.463 versus 6.733 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.577 versus 8.015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7222 versus 911 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 versus 1338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 versus 2623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7222 versus 911 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 versus 1338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 versus 2623 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
- 8.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 195 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 195 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 | 456 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 531 | 94 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18376 | 1837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.086 | 5.099 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 | 131.334 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.645 | 0.355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.463 | 6.733 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.577 | 8.015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7222 | 911 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 1338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 | 2623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7222 | 911 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 1338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 | 2623 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2004 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 5 January 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 544 | 1546 |
| Prix maintenant | $579.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.83 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1058 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1006 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,090.4 gflops | 230.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.8 billion / sec | 9.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 195 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 10.0" (25.4 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 3-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2048 MB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3500M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680 vs
AMDFirePro M6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680 vs
NVIDIAGRID K280Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560X
