NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM versus AMD FirePro M5950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM and AMD FirePro M5950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1033 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 42% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 24.79 GTexel / s versus 17.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 793.3 gflops versus 696.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2137 versus 1314
- 5.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6120 versus 1135
- 20.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 versus 1.199
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 versus 323.699
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 versus 0.535
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 versus 16.137
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 versus 66.638
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 versus 1528
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 versus 1528
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 4 January 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.79 GTexel / s versus 17.4 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 793.3 gflops versus 696.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2137 versus 1314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6120 versus 1135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 versus 1.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 versus 323.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.651 versus 0.535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 versus 16.137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 versus 66.638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 versus 1528 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 versus 1528 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M5950
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 384
- Environ 57% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3600 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 574 versus 472
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 versus 3309
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 versus 3309
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 480 versus 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 574 versus 472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 versus 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 versus 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 3309 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5950
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | AMD FirePro M5950 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2137 | 1314 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 472 | 574 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6120 | 1135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 | 1.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 | 323.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.651 | 0.535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 | 16.137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 | 66.638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 | 1528 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 | 2590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 | 1528 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 | 2590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | AMD FirePro M5950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Whistler |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 4 January 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1004 | 1007 |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 793.3 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.79 GTexel / s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 716 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | n / a | |
| Facteur de forme | MXM-A | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 57 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM vs
AMDFirePro M5950
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM vs
NVIDIATesla K20c
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M275
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M360
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM
