NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 8870M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 8870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 31 GTexel / s
- Around 40% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 992.0 gflops
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1638
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 8804
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 24.097
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 465.496
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 2.211
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 106.848
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 31 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 992.0 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 1638 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 8804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 24.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 vs 465.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 vs 2.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 106.848 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8870M
- 900x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 629 vs 521
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.126 vs 26.532
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3329
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3329
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 629 vs 521 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.126 vs 26.532 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3329 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8870M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | 1638 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 629 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | 8804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 24.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 465.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 2.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 38.126 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 106.848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 8870M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Venus |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Place in performance rating | 707 | 726 |
| Price now | $299.01 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 725 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 31 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDFirePro S7100X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 555
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100
