NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti versus AMD Radeon HD 8870M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 8870M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 50% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 40% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 43.4 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s
- Environ 40% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,389 gflops versus 992.0 gflops
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 versus 1638
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 versus 8804
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 24.097
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 versus 465.496
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 versus 2.211
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 versus 106.848
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops versus 992.0 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 versus 1638 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 versus 8804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 24.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 versus 465.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 versus 2.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 versus 106.848 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8870M
- 900x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 629 versus 521
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.126 versus 26.532
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3329
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3329
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 629 versus 521 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.126 versus 26.532 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3329 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8870M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | 1638 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 629 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | 8804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 24.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 465.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 2.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 38.126 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 106.848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 8870M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Venus |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 707 | 726 |
| Prix maintenant | $299.01 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | 31 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
| Unités de Compute | 10 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | 4500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDFirePro S7100X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 555
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100
