NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
- 7.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 548
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 194
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 4936
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 13.569
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 162.886
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.009
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 19.668
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 77.819
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 1119
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1284
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2264
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 1119
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1284
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2264
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 1 November 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 499.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 548 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 4936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 13.569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 vs 162.886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 vs 1.009 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 vs 19.668 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 77.819 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 1119 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1284 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 2264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 1119 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1284 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 2264 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 360x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | 548 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | 4936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 13.569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 162.886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 1.009 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 19.668 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 77.819 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 1119 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 1284 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 2264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 1119 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 1284 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 2264 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Oland |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 1 November 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Place in performance rating | 707 | 1406 |
| Price now | $299.01 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 730 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 499.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDFirePro S7100X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 555
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100
