NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs ATI Radeon E4690
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and ATI Radeon E4690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 9.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3899 vs 405
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 520 vs 347
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3302
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3302
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 1 June 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3899 vs 405 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 520 vs 347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 3302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 3302 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E4690
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 280x more memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E4690
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | ATI Radeon E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3899 | 405 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 520 | 347 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11515 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3302 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 112 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | ATI Radeon E4690 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM107 | RV730 |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 1 June 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Place in performance rating | 726 | 729 |
| Price now | $299.01 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 1400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
ATIRadeon E4690
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon E8950
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100
