NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• 2.9x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 9.4x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• 32x more pipelines: 640 vs 20
• 30.2x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 46 gflops
• 7.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 524
• Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 275
• 5.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 2143
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 7.844
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 154.696
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 0.958
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 9.084
• 16x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 8.335
• 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 817
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1381
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3044
• 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 817
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1381
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3044

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 60 Watt
• Around 30% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 152 vs 117

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3901 524
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	521 275
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11526 2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.463 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	642.715 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.933 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.532 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	133.458 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4843 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4843 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3329 3044
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	117 152

Compare specifications (specs)