NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 33% higher pipelines: 640 vs 2x 240
Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 2x 596.2 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
4.8x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 289 Watt
Around 14% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1792 MB
3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1201
5.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 96
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3443
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3107
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3443
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3107

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 February 2014 vs 8 January 2009
Pipelines	640 vs 2x 240
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops vs 2x 596.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 289 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1792 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3901 vs 1201
PassMark - G2D Mark	521 vs 96
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 vs 3443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329 vs 3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 vs 3443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329 vs 3107

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 1020 MHz
2.1x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s
199.8x more memory clock speed: 999 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21048 vs 11526

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1242 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Texture fill rate	92.2 billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Memory clock speed	999 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	21048 vs 11526

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3901

1201

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

521

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11526

21048

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3683

3443

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

3107

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3683

3443

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

3107

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
PassMark - G3D Mark	3901	1201
PassMark - G2D Mark	521	96
Geekbench - OpenCL	11526	21048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683	3443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329	3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683	3443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329	3107
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	117

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GM107	GT200B
Launch date	18 February 2014	8 January 2009
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	$500
Place in performance rating	707	920
Price now	$299.01	$159.99
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	15.02	8.53
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	1020 MHz	1242 MHz
CUDA cores	640	480
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops	2x 596.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	640	2x 240
Texture fill rate	43.4 GTexel / s	92.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	289 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,400 million
CUDA cores per GPU		240
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	S / PDIF
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIHDMI
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	6-pin & 8-pin
SLI options		Quad
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.4	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1792 MB
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB / s	223.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	896 Bit
Memory clock speed	5.4 GB/s	999 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Shared memory	0
Memory interface width per GPU		448 Bit
Standard memory config per GPU		896 MB
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)		128bit
SLI