NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 1,244 gflops
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 2721
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 424
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 6674
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 18.462
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 427.88
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.899
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 23.742
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 61.965
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 3798
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3651
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 3798
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3651
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 1 March 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 1,244 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 80 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 2721 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 424 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 6674 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 18.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 vs 427.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 vs 1.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 vs 23.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 61.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 3321 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 1123.2x more memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- 7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 817 vs 117
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 vs 117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | 2721 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 424 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | 6674 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 18.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 427.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 1.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 23.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 61.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3321 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM107 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 1 March 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $1,269 |
| Place in performance rating | 707 | 866 |
| Price now | $299.01 | $225.65 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | 14.81 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 810 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,244 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 51.84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 134.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 5616 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDFirePro S7100X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 555
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100
