NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti versus NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 12% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,389 gflops versus 1,244 gflops
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 80 Watt
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 versus 2721
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 versus 424
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 versus 6674
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 18.462
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 versus 427.88
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 versus 1.899
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 versus 23.742
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 versus 61.965
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 versus 3798
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3651
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 versus 3798
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3651
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 1 March 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops versus 1,244 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 80 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 versus 2721 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 versus 424 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 versus 6674 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 18.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 versus 427.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 versus 1.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 versus 23.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 versus 61.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 versus 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 versus 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 versus 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 versus 3321 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Environ 19% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 51.84 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 640
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- 1123.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5616 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- 7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 817 versus 117
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.84 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 640 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5616 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 versus 117 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | 2721 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | 424 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | 6674 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 18.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 427.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 1.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 23.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 61.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3321 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 | 817 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 1 March 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $1,269 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 707 | 866 |
| Prix maintenant | $299.01 | $225.65 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | 14.81 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | 1,244 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | 51.84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 2,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | 134.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | 5616 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDFirePro S7100X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 555
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100
