NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and ATI Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 725 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 151 Watt
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3354 vs 1979
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 504 vs 402
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 vs 16.467
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.341 vs 1.541
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 3806
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 3806
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 30 September 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 151 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3354 vs 1979 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 504 vs 402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 vs 16.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 vs 1.541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 vs 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 vs 3806 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5850
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 52.2 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 1440 vs 512
- Around 88% better floating-point performance: 2,088.0 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
- 800x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33977 vs 9392
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1109.612 vs 639.427
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.08 vs 32
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 52.2 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1440 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,088.0 gflops vs 1,111 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33977 vs 9392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1109.612 vs 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.08 vs 32 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3354 | 1979 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 504 | 402 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9392 | 33977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 16.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 1109.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 1.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 42.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1048 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GM107 | Cypress |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 30 September 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | $299 |
| Place in performance rating | 754 | 757 |
| Price now | $150.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 725 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | 2,088.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1440 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | 52.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 151 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIAGRID K220Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDFirePro S7100X
