NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 versus ATI Radeon HD 5850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and ATI Radeon HD 5850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 50% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 151 Watt
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3353 versus 1979
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 504 versus 402
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 versus 16.467
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.341 versus 1.541
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 versus 3806
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 versus 3806
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 30 September 2009 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 151 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3353 versus 1979 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 504 versus 402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 versus 16.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 versus 1.541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 versus 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 versus 3806 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5850
- Environ 50% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 52.2 GTexel / s versus 34.72 GTexel / s
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 1440 versus 512
- Environ 88% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,088.0 gflops versus 1,111 gflops
- 800x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- 3.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 33977 versus 9491
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1109.612 versus 639.427
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.08 versus 32
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.2 GTexel / s versus 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1440 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,088.0 gflops versus 1,111 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33977 versus 9491 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1109.612 versus 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.08 versus 32 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3346 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3353 | 1979 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 504 | 402 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9491 | 33977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 16.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 1109.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 1.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 42.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1048 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Cypress |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 30 September 2009 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | $299 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 754 | 757 |
| Prix maintenant | $150.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.54 | |
| Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 512 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,111 gflops | 2,088.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1440 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s | 52.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 151 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 2,154 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIAGRID K220Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDFirePro S7100X
