NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 versus NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 39% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 732 MHz
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 235 Watt
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 511 versus 198
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 1032
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 1032
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 12 November 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 732 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 235 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 511 versus 198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 1032 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 164.0 GTexel / s versus 34.72 GTexel / s
- 5.3x plus de pipelines: 2688 versus 512
- 3.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,935 gflops versus 1,111 gflops
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 1 GB
- 1040x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5200 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4403 versus 3338
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16664 versus 9266
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.455 versus 34.239
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1666.354 versus 639.427
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.836 versus 2.341
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 92.472 versus 32
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 275.229 versus 69.814
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 versus 3346
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 versus 3346
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 164.0 GTexel / s versus 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2688 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops versus 1,111 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4403 versus 3338 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16664 versus 9266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 versus 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 versus 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 versus 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 versus 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 versus 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 versus 3346 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3338 | 4403 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 511 | 198 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9266 | 16664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 49.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 1666.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 5.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 92.472 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | 275.229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 7038 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1051 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK110 |
| Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 12 November 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | $7,699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 755 | 757 |
| Prix maintenant | $150.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 512 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,111 gflops | 3,935 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 2688 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s | 164.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 235 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 7,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 249.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | 5200 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIATesla K20Xm
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon 630
