NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 18.8x more texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
- 57.6x more pipelines: 1152 vs 20
- 47.6x better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 50 gflops
- 7.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 vs 630
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 314
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14261 vs 3210
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.505 vs 8.844
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 vs 171.17
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.09 vs 1.115
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.457 vs 10.385
- 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.186 vs 12.361
- 7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 988
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1702
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2808
- 7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 988
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1702
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2808
- 8.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 vs 194
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 20 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops vs 50 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 vs 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 vs 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 vs 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 vs 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 vs 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 vs 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 vs 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 vs 194 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 170 Watt
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 | 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 | 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 | 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 | 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 | 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 | 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 | 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | GK104 | Haswell GT2 |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 3 June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Place in performance rating | 576 | 1359 |
| Price now | $249.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 400 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1152 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops | 50 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 20 |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4730
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIATesla C2050
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIATesla K40m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M290X
