NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 94.1 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s
- 57.6x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 20
- 47.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,378 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 7.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 versus 630
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 versus 314
- 4.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14261 versus 3210
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.505 versus 8.844
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 versus 171.17
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.09 versus 1.115
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.457 versus 10.385
- 6.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.186 versus 12.361
- 7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 versus 988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 1702
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 2808
- 7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 versus 988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 1702
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 2808
- 8.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 versus 194
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 400 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 94.1 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,378 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 versus 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 versus 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 versus 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 versus 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 versus 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 versus 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 versus 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 versus 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 versus 194 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 170 Watt
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 170 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 | 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 | 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 | 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 | 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 | 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 | 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 | 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 7.5 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | Haswell GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 25 June 2013 | 3 June 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 576 | 1359 |
| Prix maintenant | $249.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1152 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,378 gflops | 50 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 20 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 94.1 billion / sec | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 500 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4730
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIATesla C2050
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIATesla K40m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M290X
