NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 475 MHz
- 6.2x more texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 15.2 GTexel / s
- 4.5x more pipelines: 1152 vs 256
- 4.9x better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 486.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2808 MHz
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 vs 1476
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 382
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14261 vs 5013
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.505 vs 13.345
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 vs 306.122
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.09 vs 1.552
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.457 vs 20.453
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.186 vs 39.651
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 2079
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3472
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 2079
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3472
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 vs 2 November 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 475 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 15.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 256 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops vs 486.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 2808 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 vs 1476 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 382 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 vs 5013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 vs 13.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 vs 306.122 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 vs 1.552 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 vs 20.453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 vs 39.651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 vs 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 vs 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 142 Watt vs 170 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 142 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 | 1476 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | 382 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 | 5013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 | 13.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 | 306.122 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 | 1.552 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 | 20.453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 | 39.651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 | 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 | 2079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3472 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK104 | GF100 |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 2 November 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | $1,199 |
| Place in performance rating | 576 | 1047 |
| Price now | $249.99 | $141.66 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | 17.08 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 475 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1152 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops | 486.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 256 |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec | 15.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 142 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 241 mm |
| Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 89.9 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 2808 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4730
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIATesla C2050
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIATesla K40m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M290X
