NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 30.94 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 742.7 gflops
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1714 vs 1330
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5605 vs 4267
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 vs 251.09
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.512 vs 1.144
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 vs 10.872
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.992 vs 13.423
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 vs 2351
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 vs 2351
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 May 2013 vs 9 January 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 GTexel / s vs 30.94 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops vs 742.7 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1714 vs 1330 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5605 vs 4267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.673 vs 15.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 vs 251.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.512 vs 1.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 vs 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.992 vs 13.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 vs 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 vs 2351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 657 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 967 MHz vs 657 MHz
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 vs 231
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 vs 2728
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 vs 2728
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz vs 657 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 967 MHz vs 657 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 55 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 vs 231 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 vs 2728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 vs 2728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 3333 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1714 | 1330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 231 | 244 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5605 | 4267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.673 | 15.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 | 251.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.512 | 1.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 | 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.992 | 13.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 | 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2728 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 | 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2728 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3334 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 461 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK106 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 30 May 2013 | 9 January 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1114 | 1141 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 657 MHz | 967 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 941 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 GTexel / s | 30.94 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | Up to 1920x1200 |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 64.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 4012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6770
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDFirePro W5130M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M440
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M420
