NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 36% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 42.05 GTexel / s versus 30.94 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- Environ 36% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,009 gflops versus 742.7 gflops
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1714 versus 1330
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5605 versus 4267
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 versus 251.09
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.512 versus 1.144
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 versus 10.872
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.992 versus 13.423
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 versus 2351
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 versus 2351
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 versus 9 January 2013 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42.05 GTexel / s versus 30.94 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,009 gflops versus 742.7 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1714 versus 1330 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5605 versus 4267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.673 versus 15.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 versus 251.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.512 versus 1.144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.992 versus 13.423 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 versus 2351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 versus 2351 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 941 MHz versus 657 MHz
- Environ 47% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 967 MHz versus 657 MHz
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4012 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 versus 231
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 versus 2728
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 versus 2728
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz versus 657 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz versus 657 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 55 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 versus 231 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 versus 2728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 versus 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 versus 2728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 versus 3333 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1714 | 1330 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 231 | 244 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5605 | 4267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.673 | 15.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 | 251.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.512 | 1.144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.992 | 13.423 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 | 2351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2728 | 3520 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 | 2351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2728 | 3520 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3334 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 461 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK106 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 | 9 January 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1114 | 1141 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 657 MHz | 967 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 657 MHz | 941 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,009 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42.05 GTexel / s | 30.94 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | Up to 1920x1200 |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | medium sized |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.0 GB / s | 64.19 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 4012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision |