NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

  • La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
  • Environ 36% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 42.05 GTexel / s versus 30.94 GTexel / s
  • 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
  • Environ 36% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,009 gflops versus 742.7 gflops
  • Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1714 versus 1330
  • Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5605 versus 4267
  • 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 versus 251.09
  • Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.512 versus 1.144
  • 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 versus 10.872
  • 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.992 versus 13.423
  • Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 versus 2351
  • Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 versus 2351
Caractéristiques
Date de sortie 30 May 2013 versus 9 January 2013
Taux de remplissage de la texture 42.05 GTexel / s versus 30.94 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 versus 384
Performance á point flottant 1,009 gflops versus 742.7 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark 1714 versus 1330
Geekbench - OpenCL 5605 versus 4267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.673 versus 15.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 509.958 versus 251.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.512 versus 1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.422 versus 10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 53.992 versus 13.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2836 versus 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2836 versus 2351

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

  • Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 941 MHz versus 657 MHz
  • Environ 47% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 967 MHz versus 657 MHz
  • Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 55 Watt
  • 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4012 MHz versus 2000 MHz
  • Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 versus 231
  • Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 versus 2728
  • Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 versus 2728
Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau 941 MHz versus 657 MHz
Vitesse augmenté 967 MHz versus 657 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt versus 55 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire 4012 MHz versus 2000 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark 244 versus 231
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3520 versus 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3334 versus 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3520 versus 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3334 versus 3333

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1714
1330
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
231
244
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5605
4267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.673
15.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
509.958
251.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.512
1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
30.422
10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
53.992
13.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2836
2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2728
3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3333
3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2836
2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2728
3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3333
3334
Nom NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1714 1330
PassMark - G2D Mark 231 244
Geekbench - OpenCL 5605 4267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.673 15.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 509.958 251.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.512 1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.422 10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 53.992 13.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2836 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2728 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3333 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2836 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2728 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3333 3334
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0 461

Comparer les caractéristiques

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Essentiel

Architecture Kepler Kepler
Nom de code GK106 GK107
Date de sortie 30 May 2013 9 January 2013
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 1114 1141
Genre Laptop Laptop

Infos techniques

Vitesse augmenté 657 MHz 967 MHz
Vitesse du noyau 657 MHz 941 MHz
Noyaux CUDA 768
Performance á point flottant 1,009 gflops 742.7 gflops
Processus de fabrication 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 384
Taux de remplissage de la texture 42.05 GTexel / s 30.94 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt 50 Watt
Compte de transistor 2,540 million 1,270 million

Sorties et ports de vidéo

Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI
Connecteurs d’écran No outputs No outputs
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) Up to 3840x2160 Up to 3840x2160
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 Up to 3840x2160 Up to 3840x2160
Protection du contenu HDCP
HDMI
Support du signale LVDS Up to 1920x1200 Up to 1920x1200
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA Up to 2048x1536 Up to 2048x1536

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences

Soutien de bus PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Taille du laptop large medium sized
Options SLI 1

Soutien API

DirectX 12 API 12 API
OpenCL 1.1 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Mémoire

RAM maximale 2 GB 2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire 64.0 GB / s 64.19 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire 128 Bit 128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire 2000 MHz 4012 MHz
Genre de mémoire GDDR5 DDR3, GDDR5
Mémoire partagé 0 0
Configuration standard de la mémoire GDDR5 DDR3 / GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA
3D Vision