NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 68% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec
4x more pipelines: 768 vs 192
Around 68% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 601.3 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 93% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 106 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1736 vs 1318
Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5592 vs 4936
Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.673 vs 14.758
Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 vs 302.509
Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.512 vs 0.965
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 vs 14.925
Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.992 vs 27.656
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 vs 2160
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 vs 2160

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 May 2013 vs 13 September 2010
Texture fill rate	42.05 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec
Pipelines	768 vs 192
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops vs 601.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 106 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz vs 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1736 vs 1318
Geekbench - OpenCL	5592 vs 4936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	15.673 vs 14.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	509.958 vs 302.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.512 vs 0.965
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.422 vs 14.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	53.992 vs 27.656
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2836 vs 2160
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333 vs 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2836 vs 2160
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333 vs 3325

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

2.4x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 657 MHz
Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 309 vs 232
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 vs 2728
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 vs 2728

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1566 MHz vs 657 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	309 vs 232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3365 vs 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3365 vs 2728

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1736

1318

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

232

309

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5592

4936

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.673

14.758

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

509.958

302.509

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.512

0.965

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.422

14.925

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

53.992

27.656

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2836

2160

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2728

3365

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3333

3325

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2836

2160

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2728

3365

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3333

3325

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark	1736	1318
PassMark - G2D Mark	232	309
Geekbench - OpenCL	5592	4936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	15.673	14.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	509.958	302.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.512	0.965
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.422	14.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	53.992	27.656
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2836	2160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2728	3365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333	3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2836	2160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2728	3365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333	3325
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK106	GF106
Launch date	30 May 2013	13 September 2010
Place in performance rating	1132	1135
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$129
Price now		$64.99
Value for money (0-100)		26.46
Technical info
Boost clock speed	657 MHz
Core clock speed	657 MHz	1566 MHz
CUDA cores	768	192
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops	601.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	768	192
Texture fill rate	42.05 GTexel / s	25.1 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	106 Watt
Transistor count	2,540 million	1,170 million
Maximum GPU temperature		100 °C
Video outputs and ports
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0	PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
SLI options	1	2-way
Height		4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length		8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm)
Supplementary power connectors		6-pin
API support
DirectX	12 API	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.2
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	64.0 GB / s	57.7 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA
3D Vision
DSR
SLI