NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M versus NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and NVIDIA Tesla M2090 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 657 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 16% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 42.05 GTexel / s versus 36.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 512
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 4.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 250 Watt
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 versus 25 July 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 657 MHz versus 650 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42.05 GTexel / s versus 36.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 512 |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M2090
- Environ 32% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,331.2 gflops versus 1,009 gflops
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 85% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3700 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 13075 versus 5578
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.87 versus 15.673
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1127.187 versus 509.958
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.833 versus 1.512
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.33 versus 30.422
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 119.136 versus 53.992
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,331.2 gflops versus 1,009 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3700 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 versus 5578 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 versus 15.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 versus 509.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 versus 1.512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 versus 30.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 versus 53.992 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2090
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1720 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5578 | 13075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.673 | 33.87 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 | 1127.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.512 | 3.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 | 57.33 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.992 | 119.136 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2728 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2728 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK106 | GF110 |
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1137 | 1139 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 657 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 657 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,009 gflops | 1,331.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42.05 GTexel / s | 36.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 3,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Longeur | 248 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.0 GB / s | 177.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 3700 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDRadeon E6760
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
NVIDIATesla M2090
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M265DX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M315
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDFirePro W5130M
