NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs AMD Radeon HD 6650M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon HD 6650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

AMD Radeon HD 6650M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 42% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 600 MHz
3.8x more texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
Around 60% higher pipelines: 768 vs 480
2.3x better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1995 vs 754
Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 vs 223
Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7107 vs 5780
Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 1866
Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 1866

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 May 2013 vs 4 January 2011
Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate	55.23 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 480
Floating-point performance	1,326 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1995 vs 754
PassMark - G2D Mark	289 vs 223
Geekbench - OpenCL	7107 vs 5780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3275 vs 1866
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3275 vs 1866

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6650M

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3334 vs 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3334 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6650M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1995

754

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

289

223

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7107

5780

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3275

1866

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3333

3334

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3275

1866

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3333

3334

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M	AMD Radeon HD 6650M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1995	754
PassMark - G2D Mark	289	223
Geekbench - OpenCL	7107	5780
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	520.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.731
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	43.535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3275	1866
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333	3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3275	1866
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333	3334
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	759

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M	AMD Radeon HD 6650M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Code name	GK106	Whistler
Launch date	30 May 2013	4 January 2011
Place in performance rating	1047	1050
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	863 MHz
Core clock speed	850 MHz	600 MHz
CUDA cores	768
Floating-point performance	1,326 gflops	576.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	768	480
Texture fill rate	55.23 GTexel / s	14.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt
Transistor count	2,540 million	716 million
Video outputs and ports
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large	medium sized
SLI options	1
API support
DirectX	12 API	11.2 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	64.0 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Shared memory	0	0
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA
Verde Drivers