NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 738 MHz
• 7.6x more texture fill rate: 89.26 GTexel / s vs 11.81 GTexel / s
• 42x more pipelines: 1344 vs 32
• 18.2x better floating-point performance: 2,142 gflops vs 117.5 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• 5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1008 MHz
• 21.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3635 vs 166
• 10.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 554 vs 51
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 1731
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 1731

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

• 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 7.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 179.899 vs 24.986
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1813.265 vs 826.477
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.817 vs 2.362
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.948 vs 35.269
• 13.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 757.451 vs 55.394
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3689 vs 3657
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3689 vs 3657

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3635 166
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	554 51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.986 179.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	826.477 1813.265
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.362 13.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.269 38.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	55.394 757.451
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3657 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3657 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 1731

Compare specifications (specs)