NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 210 billion / sec vs 128.0 GTexel / s
- Around 41% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 2048
- Around 30% better floating-point performance: 5,345 gflops vs 4,096 gflops
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9457 vs 6138
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2001.15 vs 1434.496
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 9603
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 9603
- Around 44% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3390 vs 2351
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 November 2013 vs 8 October 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 210 billion / sec vs 128.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 5,345 gflops vs 4,096 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9457 vs 6138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 vs 1434.496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 vs 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 vs 9603 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3390 vs 2351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 928 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 675 vs 632
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 89.187 vs 75.429
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.656 vs 6.854
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.459 vs 58.067
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 493.57 vs 182.11
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 928 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 675 vs 632 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 vs 75.429 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 vs 6.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 vs 58.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 vs 182.11 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3342 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9457 | 6138 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 632 | 675 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28360 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.429 | 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 | 1434.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.854 | 7.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.067 | 87.459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 182.11 | 493.57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3390 | 2351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK110B | Tahiti |
Launch date | 7 November 2013 | 8 October 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 393 | 372 |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.80 | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 928 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 875 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,345 gflops | 4,096 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 210 billion / sec | 128.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 4,313 million |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 275 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336 GB / s | 288 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |