NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti versus AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 280X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 64% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 210 billion / sec versus 128.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 41% de pipelines plus haut: 2880 versus 2048
- Environ 30% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,345 gflops versus 4,096 gflops
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9457 versus 6138
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2001.15 versus 1434.496
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 versus 9603
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 versus 9603
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3390 versus 2351
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 November 2013 versus 8 October 2013 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 210 billion / sec versus 128.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 versus 2048 |
Performance á point flottant | 5,345 gflops versus 4,096 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9457 versus 6138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 versus 1434.496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 versus 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 versus 9603 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3390 versus 2351 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 928 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 675 versus 632
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 89.187 versus 75.429
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.656 versus 6.854
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.459 versus 58.067
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 493.57 versus 182.11
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 928 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 675 versus 632 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 versus 75.429 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 versus 6.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 versus 58.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 versus 182.11 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 versus 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 versus 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3342 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9457 | 6138 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 632 | 675 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28360 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.429 | 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 | 1434.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.854 | 7.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.067 | 87.459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 182.11 | 493.57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3390 | 2351 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GK110B | Tahiti |
Date de sortie | 7 November 2013 | 8 October 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 393 | 372 |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.80 | |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 928 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 875 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 2880 | |
Performance á point flottant | 5,345 gflops | 4,096 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 210 billion / sec | 128.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,080 million | 4,313 million |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 275 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 3 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 336 GB / s | 288 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |