NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs ATI Radeon HD 4810
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti and ATI Radeon HD 4810 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 10.5x more texture fill rate: 210 billion / sec vs 20 GTexel / s
- 4.5x more pipelines: 2880 vs 640
- 6.7x better floating-point performance: 5,345 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 512 MB
- 12.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9517 vs 769
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 635 vs 425
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 November 2013 vs 28 May 2009 |
Core clock speed | 875 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 210 billion / sec vs 20 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 5,345 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9517 vs 769 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 635 vs 425 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4810
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 514.3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4810
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 4810 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9517 | 769 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 635 | 425 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28211 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.429 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.067 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 182.11 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 4810 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK110B | RV770 |
Launch date | 7 November 2013 | 28 May 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Place in performance rating | 397 | 339 |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 928 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 875 MHz | 625 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,345 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 210 billion / sec | 20 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 95 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 246 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 336 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |